#GIT REBASE HOW TO#
#GIT REBASE PLUS#

How to use git rebase? Simple git rebase scenario - no conflictsīelow, I show you an example, how you can do git rebase. This is illustrated below:Ī-B-C-D branch 'master' (refers to commit 'D') This means that it isn’t referring to a named branch, but only to some specific commit. In this case, you will say that your HEAD is in detached state. It is possible to move this HEAD marker to a specific commit. So, when you pull all changes from the remote repository, you can say that you are on top of the HEAD. If on the remote repository are changes, that you don’t have them locally, you can say that you are behind the remote HEAD. You can think about it as a marker, which tells you where you are now. HEAD is a reference to the last change in the current branch. We often say that rebase moves your local changes on top of the HEAD. Then one by one it will move each of your local changes on top of the downloaded changes. But when you use rebase, git moves your local changes to a temporary area and pull all changes from the remote repository to your branch. After you resolve them and commit, the merge commit will be generated. In case there will be some conflicts, you will see them as one list. It will put all changes together in date-time order. When you use git merge, git will try to resolve conflicts at once. Let’s compare git merge and git rebase with more details. Of course, if all of your team members will use this git rebase approach. The same will be for the rest of your team. This approach will allow you to have all of your commits as one common piece. If you are interested in order commits by logical steps, I recommend you to use git rebase command. These commits are automatically generated during the merging process. The other thing is that you can see commits with the title “Merged in…”. You can see that even you have some connected commits, after the merge, it looks like one big mess. In this case, git tree can look like this: It’s very hard to reproduce the way of thinking or the implementation steps for a specific feature. After combining all changes, one of your commits is on top of the git tree and one somewhere in a middle. In the meantime, your team did other tasks.

Everything is working, so you decide to merge those changes with the master branch. In the second commit, you add communication with the backend. Imagine that you need to implement login functionality. In some cases it’s a good solution, but not here. But, what you could notice too, is that the changes are in a very strange order. Your branch is merged with the main branch. This will allow you to combine your changes with the main branch. Normally, when you start working with branches, you will just use git merge command. This is the third article in the git series, so if you want to know more about basics of git usage, go to my previous articles. This is very useful especially when you work in a team. It will allow you to have a better structure and order of your commits.

Today, I have a very nice git feature for you. This is normal that you do small steps and discover new features on the way. Given the above recommendations, I prefer to use rebase for short-term, local branches and the merge command for branches in the public repository.When you are starting your adventure with git, it’s hard to know everything from the beginning. When the exact commit branch history is important (because the rebase command rewrites the history of commits).Rewriting such branches will hinder the work of other team members. 02 When to use the rebase command, and when the merge command? This makes the chain of commits linear and more readable. The style branch commit tree has been rewritten to make the master branch a part of the commit history. The commit tree, however, is a bit different.

#GIT REBASE PLUS#

The style branch currently contains all its changes, plus all the changes of the master branch. The result of the rebase command looks much like that of the merge command. * 911e8c9 | First Commit 01 Merging VS rebasing * 8c32287 | Added standard HTML page tags (v1-beta) * 6e6c76a | Updated index.html (HEAD, style) Run: git checkout styleįirst, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it. This time we are going to use the rebase command rather than merge. So we went back in history before the first merge and wanna relocate the changes in master to our style branch. To use rebase instead of the merge command.

Git rebase